I was recently cruising through youtube, and came across a clip of Ann Coulter arguing with Mrs. Edwards. I can’t recall her first name… so Mrs. Edwards will have to do (call me too lazy to use wikipedia). Ann Coulter was sitting on stage with Chris Matthews on Hardball, and Mrs. Edwards decides to call out of no where and ask Ann politely to quit messing with her man (meow). Ann tries to talk over her, and she continuously says, “So, I should just stop writing books?” Whenever Mrs. Edwards would say – just stop using hateful words and comments. Ann would respond in what appeared to be hateful words and comments. Mrs. Edwards wasnt aware that you can’t fight fire with fire… Ann Coulter has a distinct way of speaking and acting – asking politely won’t get you anywhere - you might as well not try if you’re going to do that.
My stance on Ann Coulter is – I don’t hate her, but she’s not someone I agree with. She can say whatever the hell she wants about mooching 9/11 widows or people being killed in Iraq – Free Speech, baby – likewise, Hugo Chavez can say whatever he wants about President Bush – Free Speech, baby. You need to accept that she might be some crazy woman who’s off her rocker, or she may actually have some truth behind her words… though it may not be immediately apparent to you.
“Liberals” have villified her in the media (though honestly, she gives them some good reasons to with some of her comments). It works for her. I’ve heard some critcisms of her, but very few of them good. Mostly they’re rants following the lines of “Ann Coulter is a cruel. horsefaced anti-Christ!” C’mon now, is there really a need to call her horse-faced? How does that disprove anything she says? Calling her horsefaced or anything for that matter is like her calling John Edwards a “faggot”. This kind of retort would only carry weight if you were 8 years old, and if you were speaking to other stupid eight year olds. Otherwise – your ship doesn’t hold water. At least Coulter cites facts right? She can be or at least sound smart.
Once I took “Anthropology 102: Comparison of Culture” for the easy A in college. The professor was a raging feminist and decided to only compare women in culture. That would have been all good if that’s what the class was about (Strike 1). She made us read “Coming of Age in Somoa” by Margaret Mead (Strike 2). She tried to make this sound fair. She told us of Mead’s critics…. some doctor in England who believed that she was not a true anthropologist because she didn’t live with the Somoans. How does she disprove his claim? By calling him a lunatic and saying he went ape-shit in a museum and busted the genitals off dummies (Strike 3). Umm Professor, how does that disprove his claim? Ah yes, it doesn’t. That’s when I checked out of the class mentally and settled for a B because it really wasn’t worth the A. Coulter is that doctor who made a point about Mead, and liberals appear to be the professor who says she likes to whack anatomically correct dummies .
Calling Coulter ”horse-faced” or anything about her appearance will get you no where – it just automatically says Coulter wins because you’re too stupid to rebuke anything said. It just makes you kind of sad to resort to such stupid name calling or senseless “he said. she said”. Live, learn and then let live. Who cares about Ann Coulter anyway? Too many of you. Am I going to get creamed for writing this? Maybe.
JJRC